|
The
Myth Of Indian Moslem's Patriotism
Copy Pasted from Sword of
Truth Publication
The Myth Of Indian Moslem's Patriotism
Several things need to be clarified at the outset. Who are these
Indian Moslems we are talking about and patriotism for which
country?
Let us go back to 1947 when India was vivisected at the urgings of
the Moslems living in the subcontinent then. Writes V.S. Naipaul
in his Among the Believers: "Muslim passions were the
strongest among those Muslims who felt most threatened, and they
were in that part of the subcontinent which was to remain Indian.
Not all of those Muslims, not a half, not a quarter, could migrate
to Pakistan. The most experienced Muslim political organizations
were rooted in Indian India rather than in Pakistan. Indian Muslim
politicians, campaigners for Pakistan, who went to Pakistan became
men who overnight had lost their constituencies. They became men
of dwindling appeal and reputation, men without a cause, and they
were not willing to risk elections in what had turned out to be a
strange country...A special word began to be used in Pakistan for
migrants from India: mohajirs, foreigners. In the province of Sind,
especially where Karachi became a mohajir city, local resentment
built up into separatist feeling...
"Muslims were free to worship in India; it wasn't just for
the freedom of worship that Pakistan was established. Pakistan was
meant to be an Islamic state, run on Islamic principles. What did
that mean? Had there been such a state? 'The state that existed
for thirty-two years at the time of the Prophet and the first four
Caliphs.'
"Faith could only supply the simple negatives that answered
emotional needs: no alcohol, no feminine immodesty, no interest in
the banks. But soon in Pakistan these negatives were to be added
to: no political parties, no parliament, no dissent, no law
courts. So existing institutions were deemed un-Islamic and
undermined or undone; the faith was asserted because only the
faith seemed to be whole; and in the vacuum only the army could
rule."
Let us leave those Indian Muslims alone who had left for the newly
created Pakistan. What happened to the rest of them, in fact the
majority of Indian Moslems from among those who had pined for that
dreamland of Islam, just across the border, but who could not
leave the heathen land of the Hindus, a land which they would dub
later as Hindu India, as if by some invisible legal application of
quid pro quo, India could only be called Hindu India since
Pakistan was definitely an Islamic Pakistan!
These Indian Moslems who had tried to leave India of the heathens
but could not make it, are the people we are talking about in this
short write up. They found themselves in a situation that was
quite unexpected. They had been dreaming of a land where they
would be the rulers like in those days of the sultanate; instead,
they were among people whom they had always despised and
considered enemies; they were in a defenseless posture. In their
mind's eye, they enacted the scenes of torture and persecution
meted out to the Hindus during the hey day of Islamic rule and
imagined the same scenes but in the reverse sense. They saw the
Moslems, their men, women and children, at the receiving end with
no sign of help in sight! It is this scenario that made the life
of a Moslem in India unbearable.
Mind you! No one was burning them alive as they had done to Guru
Arjan Dev; no body sawed them alive as Bhai Matidas was by Emperor
Jehangir's men. No one carried away their women to the Hindus'
harems for they had none. No one destroyed their mosques for that
was contrary to the Hindu ethos. No doubt, in the mind of the
Moslem Indian, it seemed quite logical for the Hindus to do those
things but for some reason the Hindus did not do so.
No doubt this lost tribe of so called lion cubs turned into goats,
needed friends. There were Hindus too but of a different brand of
Hindus. The old Gandhi and the young Jawahar, a Hindu by accident,
came to the help of the Indian Moslem who would like to but could
not, leave 'Hindu' India.
Gandhi and Nehru explained to them that India was a secular
country and not quite like Pakistan. At first, it was difficult to
comprehend the full implication of the term. A Moslem cannot be
secular and Moslem at the same time! It took them some time to
realize that although in Spain or the Balkans, they would be
annihilated as a result of their ungrateful conduct toward the
Motherland, in Gandhi-Nehru's India, they would be given special
privileges instead, privileges that even the Hindus would not
have. Why? Because the Moslems in India were a minority. Thus in
Pakistan and Bangladesh, Moslems will enjoy special privileges by
virtue of the fact that they were the majority while in India,
they would have the same privileges because the Moslems in India
were the minority. Such was the grace of Allah! Believe it or not,
overnight the Moslems of India, the very ones who were after the
blood of the Hindus, turned secular. Even the Razakars of the
Nizam's Hyderabad became secular as well as the Moslems of Jammu
and Kashmir, under Sheikh Abdullah. (Today's militant ridden
situation is of course an aberration that has stemmed from the
earlier secularist stance, which, if left alone, will follow in
the rest of India as well, as time goes on!) All this made Nehru
strut about like a pea@#%$. They started meddling with the
Constitution, so carefully and assiduously written by Dr. Ambedkar.
Laws were passed that all those Hindu buildings destroyed, damaged
or converted into Moslem structures will not be touched by the
Hindus. That Moslems only would be able to practice polygamy and
talaaq which was, more often than not, frivolous. That no one
would ask the Moslems to atone for the crimes they or their
forbears had committed over the centuries, and make amends for
them! But surely all this cannot be true! It took quite some time
for all the others, the non-Moslems, to understand the full impact
of all such measures on the psyche of the Moslems of India. Only
gradually the rest of the people learnt that in Allah's creation
there are two kinds of world: the World of Islam or Darul Islam
and the rest or Darul Harb, in other words, the world of war.
Although belatedly, many had gotten the true meaning of Jehad or
the doctrine of permanent holy war too.
But the other concept which is also equally important, had
remained unknown. That is the law of Hudaibiya which dates back to
Prophet Mohammed and which states clearly that "Moslems are
permitted to go back on their words and break agreements with
non-Moslems." This applies to business, personal life and
politics. The question naturally arises: "Would a peace
treaty be worth anything if the other party is Moslem?" We
have seen what has happened to the much advertized Simla Pact of
Indira Gandhi (aka Khan)? Pakistan has reneged on that a long time
ago!
Now this secularism has turned into a game for Indian Moslems.
They have become so secular that now a days they object to all
worship by the Hindus in India. In public functions, lighting a
lamp is forbidden because this practice is considered religious
and NOT secular. Efforts are made to change the expressions that
sound 'Hindu' to them. Lighting a lamp which is called 'diya
jalana' in Hindi is now termed 'shamaa ko raushan karna'. Has
anyone heard such nonsense before?
India's Moslems' secularism was amply displayed when mussalmanis
wearing 'bindiyas' took part in dramas depicting imaginary Hindu
women as whores; such dramas were written by Indian Moslems whose
'dil hai Pakistani'. And who went to watch such filthy plays? Who
else but our own secular Hindu men and women while the Indian
Moslems laughed in their sleeves. Thus we saw the monkey dance of
the Sahmat and then the scandalous play called Tumhari Amrita. One
Dr. Ahmed Mukarram of the Jawahar Lal University even gave a
public speech and called Sita Devi, wife of Shri Ram, a whore. The
speech was sponsored by Sonia Gandhi, the widowed wife of Roberto
Rajiv Gandhi, son of Feroz Khan, out of the Rajiv Gandhi Fund
donated by the Hindus of India.
Such is the present state of Indian secularism of which the
greatest devotees are Indian Moslems. But then how do they feel
about India? Is there any way to guess other than deciphering
their body-language? Of course, there is. We need to examine the
record of a few and then draw our conclusion from there.
It is rightly said that to check if the rice is cooked, one needs
only to take a grain out from the boiling pot and press it; if it
is soft then all the other grains are equally soft. In the same
fashion one needs to look hard at a few of the eminent Indian
Moslems and then draw conclusions from them. However, it must be
mentioned that to the Indian Moslem, the object of loyalty is
Islam and NOT the country of residence; it is more so, if that
country is ruled by the heathens. Among them it is said that for a
Moslem, it is 'Khuda-parasti' (love of Khuda or Islam) that counts
and not 'watan-parasti' (patriotism). In order to stick to this
edict, if the Moslem has recourse to prevarication, Allah would
forgive that!
Asaf Ali: This Moslem man was an insider of Nehru's Congress. He
eventually rose to become a member of the CWC (Congress Working
Committee). At the time, no one knew that he was actually a spy
for the British. This information is now in public domain but for
fear of loss of face, the GoI does not want to speak about this.
He married a Brahmin girl Aruna, related to the Tagore family.
After nikah she became Aruna Asaf Ali, almost like Sharmila Tagore
(actual name Ayesha Sultana because in her case she also became a
Mohammedan just before the nikah) only Aruna remained a Hindu.
Nehru is said to have presided over the nikah of Asaf Ali and
Aruna. As the prime minister of India, Nehru hired Asaf Ali as
India's ambassador to the United States. That was a gift of a free
honeymoon to the couple, all at the expense of the poor
tax-payers.
Now what earth-shattering things Asaf Alis, the love-birds, did in
the US other than tourism?
India had purchased a ship-load of weapons from Uncle Sam. Instead
of directing the ship to Bombay where it was destined to go, Asaf
Ali's office directed the weapon-laden ship to Karachi. As the
ship reached Karachi it was immediately impounded by the Pakistan
government. Quite clearly, they had been advised of the impending
arrival of the ship to the port of Karachi. Now they blame an
Anglo-Indian employee of the Indian embassy in Washington D.C. for
it. Didn't they make inquiries on the bastard, before hiring him?
The fact still remains that it was Asaf Ali who was indeed
responsible for the catastrophe!
Asaf Ali was recalled to Delhi. The old Gandhi and Nehru were
closeted with the mussalman and instead of giving him a good
dressing down, the father of the nation and the chacha of the
people of India, hired Asaf Ali as the governor of the state of
Orissa. He was removed from Washington, D.C. The honeymoon was
over! If Asaf Ali is not a traitor then who is? In any other
country this man would have been shot dead or atleast sent to
prison for life. Yet nothing like that happened, thanks to the
lack of the spirit of vengeance in the Hindus under Nehru and
Gandhi and the new secularism established by Jawahar Lal, the
pandit sans yagnopaveet, destined to die of venereal disease.
It was the lawyer Asaf Ali who had pleaded for the life of Abdul
Rashid, the killer of Swami Shraddhanand, only because he was a
Mohammedan. But the British law sent Rashid to the gallows. In
today's India, no doubt, Rashid would be let go free exactly like
Bhagat and Sajjan Kumar and company! And to think that Delhi has
named a big road after this traitor!
Zakir Husain: This bearded man rose to be the first Mohammedan
president of India. Connected with the Jamia Millia Islamia, Zakir
was assumed to be the epitome of the ideal Indian Moslem and
Nehru-brand secularist. Nehru was a great admirer of this bearded
mussalman. Zakir too cheated the country; only unfortunately, the
news of his deceitful conduct came to light, later, much later.
The traitor was dead and gone when Karachi's Daily Dawn published
Zakir's entire hand-written personal letter sent to Jinnah of
Pakistan, on the eve of partition, in June 1947.
In that letter, this traitor of a mussalman, offered his services
to Jinnah. For whatever reason, Jinnah did not hire him. A very
clever man, Jinnah must have thought Zakir to be a despicable
traitor and he had no use for traitors. He left the traitor where
he would be most helpful, within the ranks of the enemy, in India
among the Hindus.
And in due course, Jawahar the 'Hindu by accident', made Zakir the
first Moslem president of secular India. The wily Zakir acted his
part well, first as a 'Khuda-parast' mussalman by building a
mosque inside the secular Rashtrapati Bhavan on the quiet and by
maintaining a false show of secularism. No one, but no one, had
the slightest idea of what kind of a reptile the Hindus were
nurturing right at the seat of power. Asaf and Zakir were, as if,
two sides of the same piece of guess what!
Instances like these are many. In no country, a potential enemy is
hired in a sensitive post. But look at the secular India: not only
India has a mussalman as the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court,
it also has Salman Haider, Salman Khurshid (a grand son of Zakir)
and a myriad of Moslem high officers. Thus there is no secret that
is not known to our enemy Pakistan, ever. While Gopalswamy
Ayyengar was fighting India's case in Geneva against Pakistan's
Zafrullah Khan, all due to the initial folly of India's
not-so-wise Pandit, his offices were filled with Moslem employees
of the Indian Foreign Ministry, headed by Nehru. Telex messages
went out of Ayyengar's office to Zaffrullah from these Moslem
employees and naturally it was much more difficult for Ayyengar to
fight his case. (See Balraj Madhok's Kashmir - The Storm Center of
the World). None of these Moslem employees were ever tried for
treason by Nehru.
Let us look at the Moslem NRIs living in this country. At one
time, there was a spate of communal riots between the Hindus and
the Moslems in India. That is no news; the news was that contrary
to the usual story, this time, a good number of Moslems were
killed inspite of the fact that the GoI had sent the police to
protect the Moslems. The outrage among the Hindus was just too
great.
A condolence meeting was held in the US by the Moslem NRIs for the
dead. It was publicly announced that prayers would be offered ONLY
for the Moslem but NOT the Hindu dead.
It will be worthwhile to look at the conduct of the secular
Moslems of India. Every time there is a new onslaught on the
Hindus, Sikhs and Buddhists in Pakistan and Bangladesh, one fails
to hear a single protest raised by the secular Moslems against
such behavior of these theocratic governments. What kind of
secular conduct is that?
Well, we should know now. One cannot prove the point of Moslems'
secularism by one Chagla or a Hamid Dalwai. And in the matter of
duplicity, it is hard to beat the Indian Moslem. He will tell you
'Islam' means 'peace' but would not breathe a word on its other
meaning. What other meaning? Well, 'Islam' also means 'surrender';
'surrender' to whom? To Allah of course but then Allah is hard to
find. One needs a 'baraqa', the cadillac among winged horses, that
can fly you to jannat or Islamic paradise to meet Allah. Since
Allah is unavailable, the heathen is to 'surrender' to the nearest
'mullah', never mind how despicably fundamentalist he is. Today,
all mullahs, including the one in the Jama masjid of old Delhi act
as secular.
To sustain this hard to preserve secularism, the NCERT (National
Council for Education, Research and Training) has issued a fatwa.
This fatwa says that the entire Indian history will have to be
re-written eliminating all those chapters on Islam's persecution
of the Hindus. Thus Akbar is depicted as a great man; no one
speaks of his 5,000 strong harem filled with captive Hindu women.
And the false history is taught at all public schools where Hindu
boys and girls study, while clamoring that India is a land where
'truth prevails'.
In Moslem schools, the story is quite different. They can have
their own syllabus according to their own choice. And what do they
teach in these schools? "That India used to be a Moslem
controlled country; the Moslems were the rulers and the Hindus,
the ruled. It was wrong for the British to have 'given away' the
bigger part of that India to the Hindus, the 'despicable
heathens', and so on". Only problem is that the mentally
handicapped scribes of the NCERT code are unaware of this
development. They did not visualize that with such a system in
operation, no 'Hindu-Muslim Bhai-Bhai' is going to work. Although
'Hindu-Hindu Bhai-Bhai' has been practically banned by the GoI,
the Hindus will, sooner or later, open up in an unexpectedly
damaging explosion of anger against not only the GoI but also all
minorities who are now hiding behind such unholy edicts. No one
has yet heard the Moslems and their leaders complain to the GoI
that such uneven treatment in the two education systems, is wrong!
That they would not go by it. But instead, the Moslems of India
have been fuelling such rank inequality and no doubt the
retribution is going to be heavy, in the not so distant a future!
Only a few, very few, of the wiser Moslems foresee that
eventuality. Because, the ultimate truth is that what inspires the
Moslem of India is NOT the saner advices in the Koran or the Hadis
but all the privileges those books give them at the expense of the
heathens. In India, what interests a Moslem the most, is the
license granted to him to insult the Hindu, at all levels. In
dramas, movies, short stories, you name it. At the back of it all,
hides a revengeful Moslem of extraordinary competence to do harm
to the Hindu, his society, his culture and his faith. And this
truth is bound to come out into the open if it has not already;
that the Indian Moslem is out to destabilize India. The false
secularism of the Indian Moslem would then be exposed for all to
see in spite of the hand-wringings of his pseudo-secular leftist
but nevertheless equally heathen friends.
* * *
It does not need too acrimonious a debate to prove that India's
Mohammedans CANNOT truly become secular. If they were truly
secular they would have been so even before the partition of the
country, such as Hamid Dalwai or Mr. Chagla. But they were not!
How do we know that? By the simple acts of commission and omission
of the rabid communalists like Mullah Bukhari of the Jama Masjid.
For instance, when Jinnah was doing his best to break up the
country, what did Bukhari and millions like him do or not do?
Wouldn't Bukhari, as he pretends now to be patriotic, would have
been a patriotic Indian then too? That is a normal assumption, is
it not? Then, don't you think that this Mullah Bukhari would have
issued a fatwa on Jinnah's head for his act of treason against
India? Did he do that? He didn't and I am sure he would not do so
even today if a similar act of treachery is committed by another
Indian Mohammedan. That is the litmus test of patriotism of
India's Mohammedans. They are born in our country, reared in our
surroundings, India's air, water, grains and milk nourish them and
behold they are all named with Arabic names! What kind of conduct
is that? They follow alien practices of camel driving countries as
their own social system contrary to all codes of civilized
conduct. Thus 'Islamputation' is a respectable thing for them to
follow! How can the India of the future survive as a respectable
civilized country in today's world with these people in important
positions, hell-bent to harm the country? In fact, Islam to the
Indian Mohammedan is nothing but anti-Hinduism. If we are unable
to see through the game even today, after nearly a thousand years
of alien rule in our land, then without doubt, time has come for
the tenth Avatar's coming! The decimation of the entire
Nehru-Gandhi dynasty along with the old Gandhi, can only be
explained away as a divine dispensation. And if we do not improve
our own conduct, even our Gods would lose interest in us and that
would be perceptible in the course of the next few years, without
a doubt.
Now and then, they tell us that there are truly secular men among
the Indian Mohammedans. Who are they? Who else but the M.J. Akbars,
the Asghar Ali Engineers, the Nooranis and so on. Have you heard
them speak out against the satanic conduct of the Islamic
government of the two contiguous countries, Pakistan and
Bangladesh? Did Zakir, Fakhruddin and Abul Kalam Azad ever speak
out against the continuous Hindu-baiting going on there. Abul
Kalam Azad even had forced Tagore's Shantiniketan to delete the
expression "Satyam Shivam Sundaram" from its letter-head
threatening to stop the GoI's financial help, when he was India's
Education Minister, as if it came from his own spiritual homeland
of camels, al Arabiyya al Saudiyya. Let us not speak of the
Shahbuddins, the Saits and the blue-eyed boy of the misguided RSS,
namely Wahiduddin Khan! They are a shame to our land!
http://www.hinduunity.org
|
