|
The
Symbol Of Ayodhya by François Gautier
How many of those who have lambasted so many times the "Hindu
fundamentalists" and lamented the destruction of the Babri
Masjid mosque as the "death of secularism in India",
have been to Ayodhya? (not Faizabad, mind you, which is Ayodhya's
twin Muslim city). When one arrived in Ayodhya before the
destruction of the mosque, one was struck by the fact that it was
a Hindu town "par excellence". More than Benares even,
it is dotted everywhere with innumerable temples; it has all these
old Hindus houses and this lovely river with its ghats which runs
through the lower town. And then, forlorn on the top, there was
this lone mosque with its two ugly domes, which looked so out of
place and unused, that any one with a right sense -and that
includes the Muslims- should see that it was not worth making an
issue of. The destruction of the Babri Masjid still evokes such
fiery reactions, that the importance of Ayodhya has been totally
overlooked: Ayodhya is a symbol, through which two India's are
facing each other. And the outcome of their confrontation will
shape the future of this country for generations to come.
The first India wants to be secular and unite together through an
egalitarian, democratic spirit all the minorities, ethnic groups,
religions and people of the country. But the question is: what
would be the binding element of this kind of India? Secularism,
says the first side. But secularism has a different meaning for
each one. For the British, it was a convenient way to divide and
rule, by treating each Indian community on par, although some were
in minority and others in majority, thereby planting the seeds of
separatisms. For the Congress Party, it has always meant giving in
to the Muslims' demands, because its leaders never could really
make out if the allegiance of Indian Muslims first want to India
and then to Islam - or vice-versa. And for India's intelligentsia,
its writers, journalists, top bureaucrats, the majority of whom
are Hindus, it means, apart from belittling its own religion and
brothers, an India which would be a faithful copy of the West:
liberal, modern, atheist, industrialized, intellectual and
western-oriented.
Moreover, what makes India unique? Certainly not its small elite
which apes the West; there are millions of these western clones in
the developing world who wear a tie, read the New York Times and
swear by liberalism and secularism to save their countries from
doom. Nor its modern youth, whom you meet in Delhi's swank
parties, who are full of the MTV culture, wear the latest Klein
jeans and Lacoste T Shirts, and who in general are useless, fat,
rich parasites, in a country which has so many talented youngsters
who live in poverty. Not even its political, bureaucratic and
judicial system; it's a copy of the British set up, which is not
fully adapted to India's unique character and conditions. What
then?
The second India which is confronting the other through the
Ayodhya issue is, of course, the India of the Hindus. When Imam
Bhukari states that "we (the Mughals) gave everything to this
country, its culture, its manners, its arts, and the Hindus by
destroying the Babri Masjid showed how little gratitude they
have", apart from making a pompous declaration, he proclaims
exactly the opposite of the reality. Because the truth is that not
only Hinduism is what makes India unique, so different from all
the other nations of the world, but it is the single most
important influence in Indian history. In the words of Sri
Aurobindo, India's Great Sage and Modern Age Avatar: "The
inner principle of Hinduism, the most tolerant and receptive of
all religious systems, is not sharply exclusive like the religious
spirit of Christianity or Islam...it is the fulfilment of the
highest tendencies of human civilisation and it will include in
its sweep the most vital impulses of modern life.."
And indeed, if you look at India today, you find that Hinduism has
permeated, influenced, shaped, every part of this country, every
religion, every culture. Be it the Christians who are like no
other Catholics of the world, or Indian Muslims, who whatever they
may say, are utterly different from their brothers in Saudi
Arabia. But Hinduism is too narrow a word, it's a corruption of
the original word "Indu", for true Hinduism is Dharma,
India's infinite and eternal spiritual knowledge, which took shape
into so many varied expressions throughout the ages, be it the
Vedantas, Buddhism, or the Arya Samaj and which is today still
very much alive in India, particularly in its rural masses, which
after all constitute 80% of its population. And the words of the
great Sage still echo in our ears: "Each nation is a shakti
or power of the evolving spirit in humanity and lives by the
principle it embodies. India is the Bharata Shakti, the living
energy of a great spiritual conception- and fidelity to it is the
very principle of her existence...But we must have a firm faith
that India must rise and be great and that everything that
happened, every difficulty, every reverse must help and further
the end..."
What one has to grasp is that the issue of Ayodhya only makes
sense when the immense harm the Muslims did to India is not
negated, as indeed it has been and still is today in the official
History books in the West - and sadly in India also. The Muslim
jehad against Hindus, alas, continues even today, whether in
Kashmir, where the last Hindus were made to flee in terror, or in
Bangladesh and Pakistan, where the crowds still regularly go on
rampage against Hindus and their temples (as told by a Bangladeshi
Muslim herself, Talisma Nasreen). It is in this light, that it
becomes extraordinary for an impartial observer to see today that
when for once, the Hindus wanted to displace, not even to destroy,
ONE mosque and rebuild the "temple", which they believe
was built in this particular place, for one of their most
cherished Gods, the one which is loved universally by all, men,
women, children, THEY were treated as rabid fundamentalists. The
great Mughals must be laughing all the way down their graves! What
a reversal of situation! What a turnabout of history! And when the
mosque was destroyed, it evoked such fiery reactions, such
pompous, overblown, sanctimonious, holier-than-thou, atrocious,
ridiculous, sly and totally undeserved outrage, both within India
and in the Western world (who should be the last one to give
lessons to India), that the importance of Ayodhya as a symbol has
been totally overlooked.
The obvious trap is to think that the demolition of the mosque in
Ayodhya is something to gloat about and that it is the duty of all
good Hindus to see that other important mosques at Mathura,
Vanarasi, or elsewhere, be also razed to the ground; or that all
cities with a Muslim name be renamed with a Hindu one. This is not
true Hinduism, which has always shown its tolerance and accepted
in its fold other creeds and faiths. Indeed a true "Indu"
India will be secular in the correct sense of the term: it will
give freedom to each religion, each culture, so that it develops
itself in the bosom of a Greater India, of which dharma, true
spirituality, will be the cementing factor.
Nevertheless, the destruction of the Babri Masjid, however
unfortunate, has made its point: the occult Mughal hold over Hindu
India has been broken and centuries of Hindu submission erased.
Hindus have proved that they too can fight.
Francois Gautier
| Your comments | Forward it to a friend
Printer Friendly Pageİ Sword of Truth, 1999 All rights reserved.
http://www.hinduunity.org
|